Sponsored
Regulation & Policy

New York court sets December hearing over Kalshi subpoenas

A signed October 29 order sets a December 14 hearing on New York’s Kalshi subpoena petition, with opposition papers due December 7.

By Lujan Odera·October 27, 2026·Edited on October 30, 2026·

Updated October 30, 2026: This report adds the signed October 29 order setting a December hearing and briefing deadlines.

A New York judge has set a December 14 hearing on the State Gaming Commission's effort to compel Kalshi Inc. and KalshiEX LLC to comply with investigative subpoenas.

Justice Sabrina B. Kraus signed the order on October 29 in New York County Supreme Court, case 454547/2026. Prediction Frontier reviewed publicly reproduced copies of page one and page two of NYSCEF Document 22, which carries an October 29 received stamp.

The hearing is scheduled for 10 a.m. Eastern in IAS Part 57, Room 218, at 60 Centre Street. The order sets November 6 for service, December 7 for opposition papers and December 11 for replies.

The subpoena request still awaits a decision

The order directs Kalshi to appear and show cause why the court should not compel compliance with the commission's July 31 subpoenas. The requested relief would require production within 10 days of service of a subsequent compliance order.

The hearing order itself does not require that production, impose civil penalties or decide whether Kalshi's contracts violate New York law.

Sponsored

Attorney General Letitia James' office represents the commission. Its petition was received by the court on October 22, according to the publicly posted petition cover.

What New York is seeking

According to SBC Americas' reporting and quoted petition excerpts, the commission seeks information about sports event contracts, services offered to New Yorkers younger than 21, advertising and corporate ownership. It alleges that Kalshi refused some requests and did not adequately answer others.

SBC Americas reported that Kalshi challenged the applicability of the state's gaming-age framework to its federally regulated exchange and raised confidentiality concerns about ownership information.

Sponsored

This records proceeding is separate from Kalshi's federal challenge to New York enforcement. The immediate question is what information the regulator can obtain for its investigation.

Source note: Prediction Frontier reviewed a public reproduction of both pages of the signed hearing order, rather than a direct NYSCEF download. Details of the underlying requests and Kalshi's objections are attributed to SBC Americas. The complete court file and proof of service have not been independently verified.

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored